Which type of code review is aimed at identifying vulnerabilities detected during earlier scanning?

The choice that accurately identifies a type of code review aimed at uncovering vulnerabilities detected during earlier scanning is the review for security issues. This process focuses specifically on security aspects of the code, examining it for potential weaknesses or flaws that could be exploited by attackers.

This type of review usually follows automated scanning processes that may highlight vulnerabilities. By concentrating on any findings revealed in those scans, the review for security issues aims to ensure that potential security risks are thoroughly evaluated and mitigated before the software is deployed. This is an essential step in the Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) as it enhances the overall security posture of the application by identifying and addressing vulnerabilities that automated tools may flag.

In contrast, other options such as a security audit involve a broader examination of security policies and practices, while a vulnerability report typically documents the identified risks but does not constitute a review process itself. Peer assessment focuses more on collaborative review among developers and may not specifically target vulnerabilities highlighted by prior scans.